[IronPython] Renaming IronPythonConsole
sriramk at gmail.com
Fri Apr 1 06:34:47 CEST 2005
>>Me too, but very unhappy that it needs 2.0. Can't there be a 1.1 and a 2.0
I don't think that would be possible - IronPython makes heavy use of 2.0
specific features such as Lightweight Code Generation
From: users-ironpython.com-bounces at lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-ironpython.com-bounces at lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of R.R.
Sent: 01 April 2005 04:17
To: users-ironpython.com at lists.ironpython.com
Subject: RE: [IronPython] Renaming IronPythonConsole
> Personally, I like ironpy. I too was a little late in voting ;-)
Count me in. I don't like fepy.
> I'm happy we're getting new releases at all, frankly.
Me too, but very unhappy that it needs 2.0. Can't there be a 1.1 and a 2.0
SwitchBL8's gebazel <http://www.rare-it.com/b2e/blogs/switchbl8>
More information about the Ironpython-users