[IronPython] Renaming IronPythonConsole

R.R. Sprinkhuizen reginald at rare-it.com
Fri Apr 1 22:31:29 CEST 2005

I guess you're right: by the time IronPython (or whatever the name will be)
is production ready, everybody will have 2.0 on their machine. Right? I
guess it's just another Microsoft way of saying: you must upgrade to 2.0. I
don't like that tone. I like Python, I like the addition of .NET and I liked
the way that IronPython *was* licensed.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Ippolito [mailto:bob at redivi.com] 
Sent: vrijdag 1 april 2005 6:48
To: Sriram Krishnan
Cc: 'R.R. Sprinkhuizen'; users-ironpython.com at lists.ironpython.com
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Renaming IronPythonConsole

On Mar 31, 2005, at 11:34 PM, Sriram Krishnan wrote:

>>> Me too, but very unhappy that it needs 2.0. Can't there be a 1.1 and 
>>> a 2.0
> version?
> I don't think that would be possible - IronPython makes heavy use of 
> 2.0 specific features such as Lightweight Code Generation

Also, it's clearly not production material yet, so why would you need to use
it on a legacy runtime?


More information about the Ironpython-users mailing list