[IronPython] Iron Python Library Usage
martmaly at exchange.microsoft.com
Mon Aug 15 22:10:25 CEST 2005
We did have discussion on this on the alias before that brought the
__future__ magic as one option. Jim and I are thinking about the right
approach, the __future__ is absolutely a valid candidate we are looking
at. We surely want to find the right answer before 1.0
> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-ironpython.com-bounces at lists.ironpython.com
> [mailto:users-ironpython.com-bounces at lists.ironpython.com] On
> Behalf Of Jonathan Jacobs
> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 1:08 PM
> To: Discussion of IronPython
> Subject: Re: [IronPython] Iron Python Library Usage
> Martin Maly wrote:
> > It is not obvious how to approach this, but definitely our
> goal is to
> > make sure that we stay true to the Python lanugage and its
> > and as I said, it is our focus from now on to make progress on the
> > libraries and built-in modules etc.
> What about __future__ magic?
> When you meet a master swordsman,
> show him your sword.
> When you meet a man who is not a poet,
> do not show him your poem.
> -- Rinzai, ninth century Zen master
> users-ironpython.com mailing list
> users-ironpython.com at lists.ironpython.com
More information about the Ironpython-users