[IronPython] Iron Python Library Usage

Martin Maly martmaly at exchange.microsoft.com
Mon Aug 15 22:10:25 CEST 2005

We did have discussion on this on the alias before that brought the
__future__ magic as one option. Jim and I are thinking about the right
approach, the __future__ is absolutely a valid candidate we are looking
at. We surely want to find the right answer before 1.0


> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-ironpython.com-bounces at lists.ironpython.com 
> [mailto:users-ironpython.com-bounces at lists.ironpython.com] On 
> Behalf Of Jonathan Jacobs
> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 1:08 PM
> To: Discussion of IronPython
> Subject: Re: [IronPython] Iron Python Library Usage
> Martin Maly wrote:
> > It is not obvious how to approach this, but definitely our 
> goal is to 
> > make sure that we stay true to the Python lanugage and its 
> libraries 
> > and as I said, it is our focus from now on to make progress on the 
> > libraries and built-in modules etc.
> What about __future__ magic?
> --
> Jonathan
> When you meet a master swordsman,
> show him your sword.
> When you meet a man who is not a poet,
> do not show him your poem.
>                  -- Rinzai, ninth century Zen master 
> _______________________________________________
> users-ironpython.com mailing list
> users-ironpython.com at lists.ironpython.com
> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com

More information about the Ironpython-users mailing list