[IronPython] NUnit with IronPython
Martin.Maly at microsoft.com
Thu Dec 8 19:08:27 CET 2005
IronPython mangles names. For example:
public static object method$f0()
The test_prefix would get therefore preserved so on a second thought, this may work, provided that nunit executes public static methods and doesn't require specific return value. Ours is always "object" in this case.
From: users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of William Reade
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 10:02 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] NUnit with IronPython
Does this mean that IronPython will emit methods, but their names will be mangled, or that it simply won't produce anything that can be effectively used from outside?
Martin Maly wrote:
>This is, sadly, true. IronPython will not preserve the name of the method as we know it...
>From: users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com
>[mailto:users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Keith J.
>Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 9:46 AM
>To: Discussion of IronPython
>Subject: Re: [IronPython] NUnit with IronPython
>For backwards compatibility, NUnit would also accept method names beginning with "test" ("test_" ?). However, I don't think IP emits methods as we know them yet?
>Keith J. Farmer // kfarmer at thuban.org
users mailing list
users at lists.ironpython.com
More information about the Ironpython-users