[IronPython] Final release packaging

J. de Hooge info at geatec.com
Mon Aug 28 10:25:42 CEST 2006


Although other options of course are welcome, I personally favor the
zero-impact installation.
It gives me insight and precise control.
 
By the way I think RC2 is quite good. Before my holicays I tried RC1 and
many things fall over in my apps.
I anticipated to have a lot to repair after the holidays, but with RC2
everything seems to run alright again.
 
Jacques de Hooge
info at geatec.com

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com] Namens Martin Maly
Verzonden: Sunday, August 27, 2006 3:43 AM
Aan: Discussion of IronPython
Onderwerp: Re: [IronPython] Final release packaging


Our intention is to continue our tradition of zero-impact installers and
release the 1.0 as the zip file.
It seems though that it may be worth looking at the msi release (in addition
to the zip file) as a possibility...
 
Martin
 
 
  _____  

From: users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com On Behalf Of jeff sacksteder
Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 6:09 PM
To: users at lists.ironpython.com
Subject: [IronPython] Final release packaging


I haven't heard any discussion about how the final release will be packaged.
Will it be similar to the existing releases or a more polished msi? I'd like
to see an installer with that drops the binaries into a known location and
adds it to the system path, add itself to add/remove programs, etc- at least
create a shell shortcut so that I can do start->run->ipy. Maybe register an
association with.py files(asking first, of course.)

Thoughts?



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ironpython-users/attachments/20060828/9ca9f027/attachment.html>


More information about the Ironpython-users mailing list