[IronPython] Rewrite of WSGI handler

Mark Rees mark.john.rees at gmail.com
Fri Nov 3 00:19:16 CET 2006


On 11/3/06, Christopher Baus <christopher at baus.net> wrote:
>
> I'm beginning to wonder if we really need the reload IronPython
> functionality in WSGI.  It adds some complexity for not a lot of real
> gain.  I thought one reason for reloading the interpreter would be to
> reload all the modules, but that can be done via WSGI middlewear.


The reload IronPython  functionality I think needs to be there for
completeness but  I feel the single  long running IP instance should be
enabled by deafult in the example web.config.

Also I ran into a problem with the flup session middlewear.  It uses the
> third, exec_info, parameter of start_response, which isn't supported in
> our current implementation.   I will admit I am not totally sure how to
> properly implement this.  According to the pep it has something to do with
> not sending the headers of the response twice.


Let me look into this

http://baus.net/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ironpython-users/attachments/20061103/48f76ce5/attachment.html>


More information about the Ironpython-users mailing list