[IronPython] Standard Python Debugging not supported
Nathan R. Ernst
ernsnat at iit.edu
Fri Oct 6 02:24:26 CEST 2006
I don't mean to flame, but Python protocol dictates that methods/members
preceded by "_" are generally not supposed to be referred to. I guess you
could kind of consider them 'protected', whilst members preceded by a
double-underscore are considered 'private' (despite being accessible if you
de-mangle the names manually).
Perhaps the modules relying upon behavior supplied by these modules should
have defects assigned against them for using these methods, as well? If its
generally accepted that a Python implementation should provide methods
prefixed by "_" on built-ins, maybe they ought to be moved towards more
prominent, public names?
Just some random thoughts on the topic...
From: users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Griffiths
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 12:34 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Standard Python Debugging not supported
Dino Viehland wrote:
> Sys._getframe() is likely significantly harder to implement. I'd be
> a little bit surprised if we get this into 1.1 but it'd be nice to
> get at some point in the future. The hard part of this probably
> isn't supporting sys._getframe() but actually supporting
> Do you know if the parameterless version will unblock you, or do you
> need the full blown functionality?
Komodo's debugger only makes calls like:
We don't seem to pass arguments in, so I expect sys._getframe() without
parameters might work.
ps for the curious, the debugger implementation we use is FOSS, and
The DBGP protocol it is based on is doc'd here:
users mailing list
users at lists.ironpython.com
More information about the Ironpython-users