[IronPython] style question - site.py
thane at tkpcorp.com
Sat Apr 14 20:18:47 CEST 2007
One problem with A) lies in the ambiguity of the contents of site.py --
portability issues could be large. Also, remember that site.py was
implemented as a solution to give IronPython access to the standard libs.
This may change at some point and solution A) could be deprecated.
From: users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Sanghyeon Seo
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 11:44 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] style question - site.py
2007/4/14, ctrachte at gmail.com <ctrachte at gmail.com>:
> Which is most correct and why?
> A) >>> site.clr.AddReference(<reference name>)
> B) >>> import clr.
> >>> clr.AddReference
> C) neither
B is correct.
Well, I can't articulate exactly why, but A just looks wrong.
users mailing list
users at lists.ironpython.com
More information about the Ironpython-users