[IronPython] clarification on current state of embedding

Justin Regele jregele23 at gmail.com
Thu Jun 18 02:04:14 CEST 2009


For a moment it looked like it would work. I can instantiate an object from
my module, which showed up in intellisense, but can't access any of the
methods within the object.

Oh well. embedding it is.

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Slide <slide.o.mix at gmail.com> wrote:

> I would think that you would always need the DLR at least because of
> the references that the "compiled" dlls would have.
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Justin Regele<jregele23 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > What is the status of referencing IPy libraries compiled to dlls by other
> > CLR languages? Google turned up that as of 1.1 you had to use the
> > embedding/hosting api's, since the dlls were not compatible with say C#
> > assemblies. There were allusions made to this being changed.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at lists.ironpython.com
> > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> slide-o-blog
> http://slide-o-blog.blogspot.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.ironpython.com
> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ironpython-users/attachments/20090617/17ff9c73/attachment.html>


More information about the Ironpython-users mailing list