[IronPython] clarification on current state of embedding

Justin Regele jregele23 at gmail.com
Thu Jun 18 03:51:41 CEST 2009


This brings up another question I've encountered. My understanding was that
IPy had problems with 3.5, and so I have been targeting 2.0. But when I try
to reference the IronPython and Microsoft.Scripting assemblies, Visual
Studio says I need 3.5



On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Curt Hagenlocher <curt at hagenlocher.org>wrote:

> Good point!
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk>wrote:
>
>> Curt Hagenlocher wrote:
>>
>>> ...except through the hosting API *and through the new C# dynamic
>>> functionality in .NET 4.0*.
>>>
>>
>> And how do you get to the classes to use them with the new dynamic
>> functionality if it isn't through the hosting API?
>>
>> What you do with them once you get them is your own business of course...
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Michael Foord <
>>> fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk <mailto:fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk>> wrote:
>>>
>>>    Justin Regele wrote:
>>>
>>>        What is the status of referencing IPy libraries compiled to
>>>        dlls by other CLR languages? Google turned up that as of 1.1
>>>        you had to use the embedding/hosting api's, since the dlls
>>>        were not compatible with say C# assemblies. There were
>>>        allusions made to this being changed.
>>>
>>>
>>>    You can't access Python classes except through the hosting API.
>>>    There are no (public) plans for this to change anytime soon.
>>>
>>>    Michael
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>        _______________________________________________
>>>        Users mailing list
>>>        Users at lists.ironpython.com <mailto:Users at lists.ironpython.com>
>>>        http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    --    http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
>>>    http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>    Users mailing list
>>>    Users at lists.ironpython.com <mailto:Users at lists.ironpython.com>
>>>    http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.ironpython.com
>>> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
>> http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.ironpython.com
>> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.ironpython.com
> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ironpython-users/attachments/20090617/6f1b9977/attachment.html>


More information about the Ironpython-users mailing list