[IronPython] Creating Dynamic Assemblies from IronPython 2.6

Dino Viehland dinov at microsoft.com
Mon Mar 23 19:11:05 CET 2009


Do you actually need MakeOrAdd or would the factory that takes multiple method infos be good enough? 

I'm just reluctant to open up the ability to modify any built-in function.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users-
> bounces at lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Hardy
> Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 1:17 PM
> To: Discussion of IronPython
> Subject: Re: [IronPython] Creating Dynamic Assemblies from IronPython
> 2.6
> 
> Hi Dino,
> I'm updating Seo's old ctypes.py to work with 2.6, so unfortuantely
> it's a little more complex than just one method. I could probably use
> a delegate that takes an object[], but BuiltinFunction contains that
> code already, and it is a lot more optimized than I could manage. Plus
> it's less code for me to write :).
> 
> - Jeff
> 
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Dino Viehland <dinov at microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> > If you only have 1 method and don't need overload resolution I'd
> suggest making a delegate using System.Delegate.CreateDelegate.
> Otherwise this could be made public.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.ironpython.com
> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com



More information about the Ironpython-users mailing list