[IronPython] Thread local storage in IronPython 2.6
Michael Foord
fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk
Mon Oct 5 14:19:24 CEST 2009
Hello all,
We're working on the port of Resolver One to IronPython 2.6. We're
finding that in quite a few of our tests our documents are now not being
garbage collected, which would be a major memory leak in Resolver One if
left unaddressed.
As far as we can *tell* what is keeping the documents alive is a
PythonFunctionStack (?) in thread local storage, put there by IronPython
itself. This doesn't happen with IronPython 2. Does this ring a bell as
a change in IronPython 2.6?
We're working on this now, so more details if we work it out.
All the best,
Michael Foord
--
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
More information about the Ironpython-users
mailing list