[IronPython] Thread local storage in IronPython 2.6
Michael Foord
fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk
Mon Oct 5 21:59:07 CEST 2009
Dino Viehland wrote:
> Michael wrote:
>
>> The recompiling issue is slightly concerning as well. Is it the case
>> that if we compile all our libraries with Pyc with frames off then we
>> can't use them from an engine with the tracing / frames / debugging
>> options on (taking advantage of frames and debugging support)?
>>
>
> Unfortunately yes - we need to be able to recompile the code to
> include the frame support. We could look at making this work but the
> end result would be that we'd need to include either the Python AST
> or the DLR AST in the compiled code (rather than just including the
> version compiled to IL). At this point I doubt we'd do this for
> 2.6.0 though.
>
>
OK, at least we know.
Michael
> That'd also have the consequence of making it much easier to reverse
> engineer the compiled code so I'm not sure how comfortable you'd be
> with that.
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.ironpython.com
> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>
--
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
More information about the Ironpython-users
mailing list