[IronPython] IronPython 2.0.3
Keith J. Farmer
kfarmer at thuban.org
Wed Jan 6 19:01:16 CET 2010
I was wondering if it might not be better (even possible) to merge the version compatibility into a switch, so people would optionally use a targetVersion flag or some-such.
Part of the difference between versions isn't simply language, it's outright bug corrections and compatibility with the base DLR, neh?
From: users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Dino Viehland
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 9:21 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] IronPython 2.0.3
Yep, 2.0.3 is the right version to target for 2.5 compatibility.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users-
> bounces at lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Perez, Justin
> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 6:48 AM
> To: users at lists.ironpython.com
> Subject: [IronPython] IronPython 2.0.3
> I am seemingly locked into Python 2.5 for compatibility with
> requirements from ESRI based products. I am wanting to write some C#
> code (very new to it) and call it from Python. Should I use IronPython
> The C# interfaces are from GPS Pathfinder Office application. Hopefully
> I detailed the question sufficiently. Thanks.
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.ironpython.com
Users mailing list
Users at lists.ironpython.com
More information about the Ironpython-users