[IronPython] The Future of IronPython

Tony Meyer tony.meyer at gmail.com
Fri Oct 22 07:01:33 CEST 2010

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Jonathan Allen <grauenwolf at gmail.com> wrote:
> Are there any important features missing from the DLR?

I would say that the issue is more that if something arose in the
future (e.g. when implementing IronPython 3 or as some sort of
IronPython-specific enhancement) that needed DLR changes, that would
previously have been (I assume) possible, and is now (again, I assume)

I would guess that this puts IronPython in a similar situation (in
this respect) to Jython (although since Java is open-source, I suppose
there is the possibility of pushing upstream there).  I don't know
enough about the way that IronPython and the DLR interact to know how
likely it is that changes like this would be needed.  There doesn't
seem to be a CPython equivalent, unless you consider that CPython is
unable to change the instruction sets that the CPython interpreter
runs on (which is stretching the similarity really).


More information about the Ironpython-users mailing list