[IronPython] The Future of IronPython

[Pablo Dalmazzo]

What do you mean by here, participating in the IronPython project or working in Microsoft?
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:24:57 -0700
From: curt at hagenlocher.org
To: users at lists.ironpython.com
Subject: Re: [IronPython] The Future of IronPython

Jimmy and Jim are two different people. Jimmy Schementi left Microsoft almost three months ago and is now working for Lab49. He will continue to be closely involved in IronRuby and IronPython. Jim Hugunin has just left for Google, and is not expected to be involved in IronPython in the future.
Dino's still here.
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:21 AM, jon vs. python <jonvspython at gmail.com> wrote:

Jim moved to Google. I don't know about Dino.

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Pablo Dalmazzo <pablodalma93 at hotmail.com> wrote:







Just curious, are Dino and Jimmy still working at Microsoft in other projects or they moved to another company if we might know?
Greetings

> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:13:18 -0600
> From: jdhardy at gmail.com


> To: users at lists.ironpython.com
> Subject: Re: [IronPython] The Future of IronPython
> 

> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Jonathan Allen <grauenwolf at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Are there any important features missing from the DLR?
> 


> There are two parts to the DLR: the "inner ring" and the "outer ring".
> The inner ring is the expression tree extensions, call sites, and some
> other infrastructure stuff - this is what shipped with .NET 4 was


> previously in Microsoft.Scripting.Core.dll. The outer ring in the
> hosting APIs - ScriptEngines, Scopes, etc. It is in the hands of the
> community now and we can do with it as we please.
> 
> As far as I know, the inner ring/.NET 4 parts are pretty solid - there


> may be a few changes, but they're likely pretty minor, and hopefully
> MS is willing to work with us (and projects like IronJS, Coljure-CLR,
> & IronScheme) if changes are needed.
> 
> The outer ring is also pretty solid as well, as far as I know, but


> it's not a concern since it can be changed at will (except that
> multiple projects depend on it, so some caution would still be
> needed). We might have to start calling that part DLR+ or something to


> avoid confusion.
> 
> - Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.ironpython.com


> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
 		 	   		  

_______________________________________________

Users mailing list

Users at lists.ironpython.com

http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com





_______________________________________________

Users mailing list

Users at lists.ironpython.com

http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com





_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users at lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ironpython-users/attachments/20101022/60e28383/attachment.html>