[Ironpython-users] Work Item 19249

Dino Viehland dinov at microsoft.com
Wed Feb 15 02:06:58 CET 2012

I'm fine w/ either, but if it's an option it should be an option which disables adding the references for scenarios like Markus wants (otherwise there really is no reason to do it).

From: ironpython-users-bounces+dinov=microsoft.com at python.org [mailto:ironpython-users-bounces+dinov=microsoft.com at python.org] On Behalf Of Slide
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 4:02 PM
To: ironpython-users at python.org
Subject: [Ironpython-users] Work Item 19249

I'd like to get the thoughts of the community on work item 19249 [1]. I am thinking we want to either make it an option, or just leave it as is. I prefer the latter.



[1] http://ironpython.codeplex.com/workitem/19249

Website: http://earl-of-code.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ironpython-users/attachments/20120215/6bd984d5/attachment.html>

More information about the Ironpython-users mailing list