[Ironpython-users] Splitting up the IronPython repo

[Markus Schaber]

Hi, Jeff,

I tried to open the IronPython solution file  using Visual Studio 2010 Pro and 2012 Express for Desktop. Both failed to open the IronPython, IronPython and IronPython.SQLite projects with the following error messages:

D:\Contribs\Ironpython\ironpython-only\Src\IronPython\IronPython.csproj : error  : Unable to read the project file 'IronPython.csproj'. 
D:\Contribs\Ironpython\ironpython-only\Src\IronPython\IronPython.csproj(516,3): The value "" of the "Project" attribute in element <Import> is invalid. Parameter "path" cannot have zero length.

D:\Contribs\Ironpython\ironpython-only\Src\IronPython.Modules\IronPython.Modules.csproj : error  : Unable to read the project file 'IronPython.Modules.csproj'. 
D:\Contribs\Ironpython\ironpython-only\Src\IronPython.Modules\IronPython.Modules.csproj(149,3): The value "" of the "Project" attribute in element <Import> is invalid. Parameter "path" cannot have zero length.

D:\Contribs\Ironpython\ironpython-only\Src\IronPython.SQLite\IronPython.SQLite.csproj : error  : Unable to read the project file 'IronPython.SQLite.csproj'. 
D:\Contribs\Ironpython\ironpython-only\Src\IronPython.SQLite\IronPython.SQLite.csproj(160,3): The value "" of the "Project" attribute in element <Import> is invalid. Parameter "path" cannot have zero length.

Some of the properties associated with the solution could not be read.

Best regards

Markus Schaber

CODESYS® a trademark of 3S-Smart Software Solutions GmbH

Inspiring Automation Solutions

3S-Smart Software Solutions GmbH
Dipl.-Inf. Markus Schaber | Product Development Core Technology
Memminger Str. 151 | 87439 Kempten | Germany
Tel. +49-831-54031-979 | Fax +49-831-54031-50

E-Mail: m.schaber at codesys.com | Web: http://www.codesys.com | CODESYS store: http://store.codesys.com
CODESYS forum: http://forum.codesys.com

Managing Directors: Dipl.Inf. Dieter Hess, Dipl.Inf. Manfred Werner | Trade register: Kempten HRB 6186 | Tax ID No.: DE 167014915

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Ironpython-users [mailto:ironpython-users-
> bounces+m.schaber=codesys.com at python.org] Im Auftrag von Jeff Hardy
> Gesendet: Montag, 20. Januar 2014 10:10
> An: ironpython-users at python.org
> Betreff: [Ironpython-users] Splitting up the IronPython repo
> 
> One of the big issues with working on IronPython is the size of the git
> repository (specifically https://github.com/IronLanguages/main) - git does
> not like really big repos, especially on Windows. Part of the problem is that
> the repository includes:
> 
> * The DLR
> * IronPython
> * IronRuby
> * Two copies of the Python stdlib
> * The Ruby stdlib
> * WiX
> * and a bunch of reference assemblies
> 
> Even on a fast machine, 'git status' takes several seconds to return.
> I believe this is because it was originally a TFS repo, which can scale to
> handle bigger repos by using a bigger server. With git that option doesn't
> exist - if the repo is too big, the only option is to split it up.
> 
> I've created two repos - https://github.com/jdhardy/dlr and
> https://github.com/jdhardy/ironpython-only - that contain just the DLR and
> IronPython, respectively. In them, git calls are nearly instantaneous, which
> makes working with it a lot less painful.
> 
> There are other advantages - the DLR can get its own release cycle and
> packaging, and IP can then depend on a specific version of the DLR.
> Each project has a modified version of the IronPython build system that makes
> it easy to build for other platforms (iOS, Android, Win8, etc. - they still
> need to ported and tested, but the builds are easier).
> 
> I did most of the work using Mono/xbuild, so I know it works there (except
> for a bug in Mono's .NET 4.5 support), but it has some errors on Windows that
> I need to sort out.
> 
> Once I get my Windows box back and get some time to fix the few remaining
> issues, I'll move the repos to the IronLanguages account and use them for
> development of a real DLR release and IronPython 3.0. Any more 2.7 releases
> will come out of the existing repo.
> 
> One downside is that copying patches between 3.0 and 2.7 is going to be extra
> work, but 3.0 will solve so many problems with strings that I think it will
> quickly become the more common target. In general Python
> 3 momentum is picking up so it's a good time (some recent hand-wringing
> notwithstanding) to try and have IronPython 3 in the right spot at the right
> time.
> 
> I haven't really addressed IronRuby because, for intents and purposes, it's
> dead.
> 
> All of that said, if anyone has any objections I'd like to hear them.
> The split repos work well for me but I'm curious if others prefer the
> combined repo.
> 
> - Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> Ironpython-users mailing list
> Ironpython-users at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ironpython-users