[ mailman-Bugs-974759 ] HTML email and attachment archiving inconsistencies

[SourceForge.net]

Bugs item #974759, was opened at 2004-06-17 14:16
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nickbower
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=974759&group_id=103

>Category: Web/CGI
Group: 2.1 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nick Bower (nickbower)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: HTML email and attachment archiving inconsistencies

Initial Comment:
With archiving set to on and content filtering off
(default options everywhere), I've encountered
inconsistencies with the mail archiving and multipart
attachments.

If I send a HTML email, the arhived message correctly
shows the text/plain porition with a link to the HTML
version.

However if I send a HTML email with an image
attachment, the archived message shows nothing except
for the link to the image.  The original message (in
either plain text or HTML) is lost.  I would have
expected the same plain text view with now 2 links to
both the HTML part and image attachment.  I've tested
this with Outlook and Evolution.

Note that if I send 1 or more images attached to a
plain text message, everything works as expected.

Thanks, Nick

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Nick Bower (nickbower)
Date: 2004-11-10 09:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=57135

Although this is a pipermail issue, no-one seems to be
noticing pipermail bugs.

Submitting to web queue.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fergus Donohue (fergusdonohue)
Date: 2004-08-20 14:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1107982

This is happening to me on Mailman 2.1.5 on Solaris. It 
probably merits more than a P5 based on the numbers of 
users who send text and html messages from outlook? If 
anyone likes I can send a shell script that generates this 
behaviour by piping data to port 25. I've tested the patches 
for Scrubber.py but they don't rectify this problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=974759&group_id=103