[Mailman-Developers] Quandry 2: Alternate hosts and sendmail
Barry A. Warsaw
bwarsaw@CNRI.Reston.Va.US (Barry A. Warsaw)
Tue, 12 May 1998 13:16:26 -0400 (EDT)
>>>>> "KM" == Ken Manheimer <klm@python.org> writes:
KM> Note that i said "most cases" - i, as list administrator, have
KM> gotten a few errant replies from users. On investigation, it
KM> turns out that a *few* MUAs, eg /bin/mail on some platform(s)
KM> or other, do not respect the reply-to header. Dammit.
KM> So i guess my question is, is it worth trying a different
KM> approach that will allow both the reply-to *and* the sender to
KM> be the -request addr, just to accomodate the few mailers that
KM> don't respect reply-to?
Brain dead MUAs will always be a fact of life and I doubt you'll ever
eliminate all problems. Stick with best current practice and try to
at least enumerate those systems that are broken (and suggest their
users fix their systems :-).
-Barry