[Mailman-Developers] Re: Huge qrunner process

[sigma@pair.com]

Except in the case where you're certain that the object is really
unreferenced, like the circular reference case.

Perhaps as a quick hack, I could rewrite qrunner and/or senddigests to
launch a new script for each list in the loop.  That would workaround the
memory problem.

Kevin

> On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:16:10AM -0500, sigma@pair.com wrote:
> 
> > I don't see any kind of destroy-no-matter-what function for objects.
> 
> There isn't. There should be no reason to have it, object disappear when
> their references go away, and you shouldn't want to destroy one that is
> still being referenced -- it would lead to nasty crashes.
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net>
> 
> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
>