[Mailman-Developers] Re: GET vs POST (was Re: subscription confirmations)
Jay R. Ashworth
Wed, 18 Jul 2001 15:29:48 -0400
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 02:02:19PM -0400, Dale Newfield wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> > Things as simple as "please click this button to confirm that you want
> > to be added to this list. If you don't, you don't need to do anything
> > at all". Which is, is it not, what we were talking about in the first
> > place...
> You're making the assumption that people can "click this button" in their
> mail readers. We don't know that. We do know that once they are looking
> at the page in their web browser, they can definitely "click this button"
> to confirm (or do nothing).
You've misunderstood me. I was *not* making the assumption that people
could "click this button" in their mailreaders, and, in fact, I think
that mailreaders that interpret HTML are the Spawn of Satan.
*My* point was that not allowing the GET to *do the work* *required*
the user to then click a button on the resulting webpage, whereas
allowing the GET to do the unsubscribe permitted the user to receive a
page which merely said "email@example.com has been unsubscribed; we promise
to miss you if you'll just go away."
You can't do that if they GET isn't allowed to do the work.
Jay R. Ashworth firstname.lastname@example.org
Member of the Technical Staff Baylink RFC 2100
The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think
Tampa Bay, Florida http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 804 5015
OS X: Because making Unix user-friendly was easier than debugging Windows
-- Simon Slavin in a.f.c