[Mailman-Developers] case-sensitive e-mail addresses
J C Lawrence
claw@kanga.nu
Wed, 02 May 2001 11:43:16 -0700
On Wed, 02 May 2001 08:26:59 -0700
Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com> wrote:
> On 5/2/01 8:05 AM, "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@baylink.com> wrote:
>> I'm afraid I must disagree: that section of 2821 implies that
> Sorry, I disagree. "may be" means the standard allows you to
> consider this as optional. That's good, because 821 made case
> sensistivity mandatory (and the switch shows the clear intent of
> the standards folks, which is moving to full case insensitivity,
> but they must have felt completely removing it was too big a step
> -- but they're telling anyone who might still have a case
> sensitive mailer it's time to fix it)
IIRC some of the old BitNet systems mandated case sensitive LHS and
were not configurable in that regard. As a result the gateways
would upcase everything for portability. Its questionable if any of
them are still on the 'net, but that's another question.
> In practice, Barry's approach is the best one. The only thing that
> happens if you practice case sensitivity on the user part is that
> users end up with multiple subscriptions, multiple copies and no
> clue how to fix it or what's wrong (and it's your fault, your
> mailer is screwed up).
The principle of least surprise. People have enough problem with
case sensitive passwords.
--
J C Lawrence claw@kanga.nu
---------(*) http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/
--=| A man is as sane as he is dangerous to his environment |=--