[Mailman-Developers] Reply-To: handling
Jay R. Ashworth
Fri, 19 Oct 2001 16:21:55 -0400
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 12:48:29PM -0700, J C Lawrence wrote:
> > Assuming that mailers correctly handle such a Reply-to.
> True. If we insert the list address at the head of the reply-to
> list then broken MUAs would seem unlikely to change their behaviour
> (or so quick testing here with a couple such MUAs suggests).
> BTW: Do Mutt et al correctly handle multi-address Reply-To?
Unknown. I'll have to try it.
> > And note that this message arrived here with no To: header, FWIW.
> My bad. To save myself typing I started the message by doing a
> group reply to a -dev post and whacking the headers to match (which
> I then failed to do cleanly).
...exposing a bug in Mutt: it will find a list-name in a CC header...
as long as there *is* a To header. It couldn't tell the message in
question was a mailing list message.
Jay R. Ashworth firstname.lastname@example.org
Member of the Technical Staff Baylink RFC 2100
The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think
Tampa Bay, Florida http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 804 5015
"Usenet: it's enough to make you loose your mind."