[Mailman-Developers] Yet another weird-a$$ potential attack problem...

[J C Lawrence]

On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 01:01:44 -0500 
Barry A Warsaw <barry@zope.com> wrote:

> The former is already implemented in MM2.1; it's just optional not
> mandatory.  The latter is an interesting idea, but I don't how
> burdensome that would be on people with today's MUA's (XEmacs/VM
> handles it, and is that really the only one that matters :).

It seems reasonable as another possible approach, but I sure as heck
wouldn't make it the only approach, or the only email-based approach.  

-- 
J C Lawrence                
---------(*)                Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. 
claw@kanga.nu               He lived as a devil, eh?		  
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/  Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.