[Mailman-Developers] Interesting study -- spam on postedaddresses...

Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 11:54:00 -0500

On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 10:09:35AM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> Mailman's interface to Pipermail is what does this check, currently
> defined as:
>     X-No-Archive: yes
>     X-Archive: no
> prevents the message from being archived in any way.  I don't think
> there are standards for this particular header (else, why would it be
> an X- header?), so I'm wondering if I understand common practice well
> enough.  I.e. should the presence of X-No-Archive: itself, regardless
> of value, prevent archiving of the message?

This depends on which side of the "enabler" argument, discussed ad
nauseum last week, you come down on.  :-)

-- jra
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra@baylink.com
Member of the Technical Staff     Baylink                             RFC 2100
The Suncoast Freenet         The Things I Think
Tampa Bay, Florida        http://baylink.pitas.com             +1 727 647 1274

   "If you don't have a dream; how're you gonna have a dream come true?"
     -- Captain Sensible, The Damned (from South Pacific's "Happy Talk")