[Mailman-Developers] Interesting study -- spam on postedaddresses...
Jay R. Ashworth
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 13:05:11 -0500
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 12:32:44PM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> >> practice well enough. I.e. should the presence of
> >> X-No-Archive: itself, regardless of value, prevent archiving of
> >> the message?
> JRA> This depends on which side of the "enabler" argument,
> JRA> discussed ad nauseum last week, you come down on. :-)
> For this particular issue, I'm happy to make it really easy for folks
> to make sure their article is not archived, even though I hope most
> people won't avail themselves of this (it harms public discourse). I
> can't imagine any other useful value for X-No-Archive: though, so I
> tend to think the value should be ignored.
And worse, when people *quote* you, it doesn't track; I tend to think
it's worse than useless (in the false sense of security sense) myself,
but in for a penny, in for a pound, I guess... yeah, I'd ignore the
Jay R. Ashworth email@example.com
Member of the Technical Staff Baylink RFC 2100
The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think
Tampa Bay, Florida http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274
"If you don't have a dream; how're you gonna have a dream come true?"
-- Captain Sensible, The Damned (from South Pacific's "Happy Talk")