[Mailman-Developers] USE_ENVELOPE_SENDER is not flexible enough
Jason R. Mastaler
jason-list-mailman-developers@mastaler.com
Tue, 29 Jan 2002 10:57:51 -0700
barry@zope.com (Barry A. Warsaw) writes:
> True. I wonder if Reply-To: ought to be added to the mix?
It wouldn't hurt. FWIW, TMDA checks Reply-To: in addition to From:
and the envelope sender.
> Note that all are easily spoofable, so that argument doesn't bother
> me much.
Exactly. Which is why I don't understand why all MLMs don't do this.
It just makes things more difficult for list subscribers. Majordomo
checks just From: and Reply-To:, ezmlm checks just the envelope
sender, etc. Well, at least we are "fixing" this here.
> If so, the order ought to go (I think)
>
> 1. From:
> 2. From_
> 3. Reply-To:
> 4. Sender:
Alrighty.
--
(TMDA (http://tmda.sourceforge.net/)
(UCE intrusion prevention in Python)