[Mailman-Developers] Modifications to msg

J C Lawrence claw@kanga.nu
Mon, 18 Mar 2002 20:12:54 -0800


On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 19:28:59 -0800 
John W Baxter <John> wrote:

> (Unlimited reply to headers sounds like a great way to get a Spam
> multiplier effect, but that wasn't a consideration at RFC writing
> time.)

RFC 2822 explicitly states that Reply-To can contain a list of
headers. RFC 822 is more ambiguous.  To my mind this single fact (if
used with Reply-To aggregation) obviates most of the arguments in the
Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful document.

-- 
J C Lawrence                
---------(*)                Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. 
claw@kanga.nu               He lived as a devil, eh?		  
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/  Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.