[Mailman-Developers] Re: Reply-To munging & member_aliases
Tom Neff
tneff at bigfoot.com
Tue Apr 22 14:34:35 EDT 2003
--On Tuesday, April 22, 2003 8:04 AM -0600 Joseph Knapka
<jknapka at earthlink.net> wrote:
> The usefulness of a subscriber reply-to option is that it should
> reduce the bandwidth devoted to reply-to munging dramatically. Rather
> than each "let's change reply-to" post turing into a
> several-hundred-post thread, as they always seem to, those threads
> would be squashed by a single reply: "If you don't like it the way it
> is, go to this URL and change it."
Except that doesn't change it for the whole list, which is what the "let's
change reply-to" complainers want - it only changes it for replies from that
particular person. The bandwidth will still be consumed.
More information about the Mailman-Developers
mailing list