[Mailman-Developers] New SpamAssassin handler on sf.

[Jeff Warnica]

I am definitly prepared to burn the field, plow salt into it, and claim
that my creation never existed if this SA module, which from its
description sounds like it does what I want, becomes a standard module..
But there definitly should be one of them included as standard.

On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 12:02, PieterB wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:07:52PM -0400, Jeff Warnica wrote:
> > ID 840426
> > 
> > This is different from the 'other' SA handler as it deals with pre-taged
> > messages. IMHO this is far more likely to be the case in an ISP
> > enviroment. 
> > ...
> 
> Concerning:
> http://sf.net/tracker/?group_id=103&atid=300103&func=detail&aid=840426
> 
> I noticed there are currently 3 patches concerning SpamAssassin
> integration with Mailman:
> 534577  Add SpamAssassin filter to mail pipeline jhenstridge 2002-03-25 Open 
> 640518  SpamAssassin handler jparise 2002-11-18 Open 
> 840426  SpamAssassin handler for pre-tagged mail jeffwarnica 2003-11-11 Open
> 
> I constructed a similar handler for SpamAssassin which can be used
> both for systems that pre-tag the messages and for systems that
> want to use python's to tag the message using spamd/spamc.
> 
> It's behavioure can be controlled by the mm_cfg parameter
> SPAMASSASSIN_USE_HEADERS. It parsers both the score and the symbols
> (tests) from the SpamAssassin-header.
> 
> It's based on http://www.daa.com.au/~james/articles/mailman-spamassassin/
> and should be able to handle both kinds of mailman/spamassassin
> integration. 
> 
> My version of the patch can be found at
> 
> 	http://gewis.nl/~pieterb/python/SpamAssassin.py.txt
> 
> It would be great if a SpamAssassin.py will be integrated in Mailman
> 2.1.4! Can anybody commit this SpamAssassin.py and James his spamd.py
> to the Mailman CVS?
> 
> Feedback is welcome,
> Regards,
> 
> Pieter
> (pieterb at sf.net)