[Mailman-Developers] Requirements for a new archiver
Brad Knowles
brad.knowles at skynet.be
Thu Oct 30 00:56:13 EST 2003
At 12:49 AM -0500 2003/10/30, J C Lawrence wrote:
> ReiserFS also does particularly well here. I haven't yet tested IBM's
> JFS. Last time I hit VxFS hard (back in the HP-UX 20.20 days) it really
> didn't like huge directories, but that may have changed since then.
HP-UX 20.20? I wasn't aware that they had gone much beyond HP-UX
11.x. Did you mean HP-UX 10.20? Now that's a beast I remember, and
remember loathing with a passion.
HP-UX 9 was slow, but rock-solid -- no matter how hard you beat
on the damn thing, it just slowed down but never stopped. HP-UX 10.x
was a real dog. HP-UX 11.x looked like it was going to shape up
better, but then I got out of AOL before we had many of those systems
in house.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
More information about the Mailman-Developers
mailing list