[Mailman-Developers] Debate about Mailman on BytesForAll
Kevin McCann
kmccann at bellanet.org
Thu Aug 26 20:38:47 CEST 2004
Frederick Noronha (FN) wrote:
> Hello from India:
>
> I am a Free Software enthusiast and co-founder of BytesForAll.org
>
> Recently, there was an interesting debate taking place on our
> discussion list, about Mailman 2.0 and future plans. Many are users of
> Mailman, and I would request those developers with the inclination to
> kindly check on the same at
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bytesforall_readers
Of course, from my point of view, the discussion is really about Mailman
3.0 and future plans. ;-)
To give context (seeing how I originally posted to bytes4all, not to
mailman-developers), we (Bellanet and other orgs) are working on a
project which is essentially an Open Sourcification of a service we run
called Dgroups (www.dgroups.org). Dgroups is similar in many ways to
YahooGroups, but without the noisy ads. Unfortunately, it is based on
proprietary components - Lyris/MS SQL/ColdFusion.
Many of you on this list might recall discussions we had last year about
the SQL-ability of Mailman. Many of you know that I have been lobbying
for this for a very, very long time. I was quite happy when Barry
started warming up to this in late 2003, early 2004. And we really made
some headway at the developers sprint in March, as it became clear that
Maki, Dale, myself and Barry were all very keen on a Mailman 3 that
would support SQL data storage. Making Mailman 3 much more modular was
certainly one of the other many goals.
The debate happening on bytes4all seems to be whether or not pushing for
a SQL-able Mailman (ala Mailman 3) is the way to go or whether it is
better to try to hack something together with Mailman 2 now, despite its
problems: pickle file storage, Pipermail archives, one-to-one
list/member relationship, etc. I say "nay" to Mailman 2 and instead
support the advancement of Mailman 3. Our organization, along with
another funder, has earmarked significant funds for the Mailman 3 effort
and look forward to sicing a few developers on Barry!
So, there's a bit of context for those of you who are interested in the
"debate."
Best,
Kevin
More information about the Mailman-Developers
mailing list