[Mailman-Developers] umbrella list model too restrictive?

[Jamie L. Penman-Smithson]

On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 20:14, eizan miyamoto wrote:
> I am wondering what the timeframe might be as far as being able to 
> define types (e.g. user vs list) for a subscriber on an individual 
> member basis.

Try expressing your opinions about the current model on the MM3-dev
list, there have been a couple of relevant threads on improving the
umbrella list model in MM3, one being:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.mailman.mm3.devel/15

HTH

-- 
-jamie <jamie at silverdream.org> | spamtrap: spam at silverdream.org
 w: http://www.silverdream.org | p: sms at silverdream.org
 pgp key @ http://silverdream.org/~jps/pub.key
 22:30:01 up 3 days, 36 min,  3 users,  load average: 0.34, 0.43, 0.49
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/attachments/20040330/edb6ae2d/attachment.bin