[Mailman-Developers] Dates again
barry at python.org
Sat Jan 1 19:04:51 CET 2005
On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 15:17, VAEZ(daneshjooye sharif) wrote:
> That's true. In fact, they're equally property of the author(s) (in
> the wording of RFC 822 and reaffirmed by 2822), and I detest mailing
> lists that insist on munging the Subject header, too. Even this
> one. If an MUA can't do the right thing based on the List-*
> headers, I want no part of it, not even to share a mailing list with it.
Subject munging pre-dates RFC 2369, and today I think it's mostly a hold
over. It also causes headaches with RFC 2047. Fortunately, you can
turn this off in Mailman.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/attachments/20050101/c05d1a09/attachment.pgp
More information about the Mailman-Developers