[Mailman-Developers] Dates again

Bob Puff bob at nleaudio.com
Sat Jan 1 19:23:11 CET 2005

One's detesting is another man's love.  I absolutely love having the subject
line prefix, as do virtually all of my mailing list owners.  I also vote for
having an option to "fix" the dates, also.  Its a headache when emailers don't
have their date set properly.


---------- Original Message -----------
From: Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org>
To: "VAEZ(daneshjooye sharif)" <vaez_ha at yahoo.com>
Cc: mailman-developers at python.org, "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org>
Sent: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 13:04:51 -0500
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] Dates again

> On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 15:17, VAEZ(daneshjooye sharif) wrote:
> > That's true. In fact, they're equally property of the author(s) (in
> > the wording of RFC 822 and reaffirmed by 2822), and I detest mailing
> > lists that insist on munging the Subject header, too. Even this
> > one. If an MUA can't do the right thing based on the List-*
> > headers, I want no part of it, not even to share a mailing list with it.
> Subject munging pre-dates RFC 2369, and today I think it's mostly a hold
> over.  It also causes headaches with RFC 2047.  Fortunately, you can
> turn this off in Mailman.
> -Barry
------- End of Original Message -------

More information about the Mailman-Developers mailing list