[Mailman-Developers] [Mailman-Users] Sender field
ngroot at imsa.edu
Fri Apr 28 20:05:45 CEST 2006
John W. Baxter wrote:
> Probably, indeed. But what happens if that header was already "taken" in
> the process that brought the message to mailman for distribution to the
As I noted in my previous response, I believe that the correct field (if
Mailman were to add a "Sender:" header) to add would be "Resent-Sender".
Please see RFC 2822, section 3.6.6. The "Resent-Sender" field may be
multivalued, so this isn't a problem. However, Mailman should not be
modifying the Sender: field at all.
"Original-Sender" is a header used when gatewaying X.400 messages into
RFC 822 messages for use in JNT mail networks. It would not be
appropriate for use here.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3283 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/attachments/20060428/c0a2ba60/attachment.bin
More information about the Mailman-Developers