[Mailman-Developers] On allowing any list member to be an email moderator
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Tue Jan 3 04:02:30 CET 2006
>>>>> "Brad" == Brad Knowles <brad at stop.mail-abuse.org> writes:
Brad> But then we're getting dangerously close to tools like
Brad> Active Spam Killer or TMDA,
Technically, yes.
Brad> which I am generally violently opposed to.
Brad> Maybe those kinds of tools are appropriate for mailing
Brad> list use but not personal use, I dunno....
I wouldn't make that distinction. Rather, I would say, does this
address have to be well-known and open? (Bug and help lists, yes.)
Can potential users be informed that the address is protected by a
challenge-response system? (In the README and on the home page, yes.)
Is it better than the alternative of requiring them to subscribe (and
optionally set themselves to no-mail)? (Not clear, if subject to
further moderation.)
Although I quit TMDA as soon as I realized I'd forgotten to whitelist
my Mom, I'd still consider using it for the address I publish on my
home page, _if it were uniquely for people who view that page_. Ie,
if I don't ever write mail from that address (or perhaps only in
response to inquiries to that address).
Of course IMHO FWIW YMMV. HTH.
--
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
More information about the Mailman-Developers
mailing list