[Mailman-Developers] dkim-signature headers

Jon Scott Stevens jon at latchkey.com
Fri Feb 2 17:04:56 CET 2007

A nice alternative to DKIM signatures...

On Feb 1, 2007, at 8:22 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:

I really don't see what the point of DKIM signatures are on an  
internal Cisco mailing list. You either work for the company or you  
don't. If you can't verify a message came from someone you work with,  
then there must be something wrong with your network. I surely hope  
that isn't the case at Cisco(TM).

Using StartTLS (RFC 2487) is a much less intrusive way to wrap and  
transport messages securely.

This all smells like Cisco(TM) trying to force their spec's on  
Mailman. I don't see an other mailing list products on this page...  

There is no guarantee that a mailing list isn't going to modify the  
content of a message.

+1 to strip DKIM headers.


More information about the Mailman-Developers mailing list