[Mailman-Developers] dkim-signature headers

[Michael Thomas]

Um, Cisco participates extensively in external mailing list for standards
bodies. And we're not trying to "force" anything; I speak for myself as
one of the authors of the spec.

       Mike


Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
> A nice alternative to DKIM signatures...
>
> On Feb 1, 2007, at 8:22 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>   
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>     
>
>
> I really don't see what the point of DKIM signatures are on an  
> internal Cisco mailing list. You either work for the company or you  
> don't. If you can't verify a message came from someone you work with,  
> then there must be something wrong with your network. I surely hope  
> that isn't the case at Cisco(TM).
>
> Using StartTLS (RFC 2487) is a much less intrusive way to wrap and  
> transport messages securely.
>
> This all smells like Cisco(TM) trying to force their spec's on  
> Mailman. I don't see an other mailing list products on this page...  
> http://www.dkim.org/deploy/index.htm
>
> There is no guarantee that a mailing list isn't going to modify the  
> content of a message.
>
> +1 to strip DKIM headers.
>
> jon
> http://subetha.tigris.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailman-Developers mailing list
> Mailman-Developers at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
> Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
> Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/mat%40cisco.com
>
> Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
>