[Mailman-Developers] dkim-signature headers
John W. Baxter
jwblist3 at olympus.net
Thu Feb 8 23:55:37 CET 2007
On 2/8/07 10:27 AM, "Barry Warsaw" <barry at python.org> wrote:
> Me too. Here's my discussion on the topic, including a concrete
> proposal for Mailman 2.1.10 and 2.2/3.0. Feel free to comment on the
> wiki on in this thread.
Looks good to me.
" IOW, a valid signed List-ID header should be indication enough that all
other signatures were subject to breakage because of mailing list garbling"
Probably should be "...all prior signatures..." not "...other...".
Since the public key for a DKIM signature comes from DNS (as I understand
it), an administrative detail is that a mailing list operator has to provide
for the key's existence in order for Mailman's attempt to sign to be
More information about the Mailman-Developers