[Mailman-Developers] Should we move to Bazaar?

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

Barry Warsaw writes:

 > I propose that no matter which way we go (Mercurial, Bazaar or  
 > something else), we convert only the trunk.  Let's leave the stable  
 > 2.1 branch on SF under Subversion, but do all new development in the  
 > dvcs.

Why not do both?  That is, if Tailor does its thing well, we can
cheaply have a dvcs mirror auto-synced to the svn 2.1 branch.  If Mark
and Tokio *both* agree, then we can abandon the svn branch.  *Until*
they do agree, people submit patches to the tracker as usual.

I predict they'll get used to the "pull the 'this-patch' branch from
my repo @ URL" style right quick, though.<grin>