[Mailman-Developers] Feedback for mailman developers

[Barry Warsaw]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Feb 7, 2008, at 6:25 AM, A.M. Kuchling wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:52:07PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>> I see no reason why the reasons for not adding the proposed feature
>> given in that thread have been invalidated.  If you have significant
>
> This patch includes two things, though: HTML headers and footers, and
> the 1-click unsubscribe.  The HTML headers don't seem as
> controversial, beyond one incorrect help message, and could go in even
> if 1-click doesn't.  I was thinking of adding HTML headers and
> footers, so I'm happy to shepherd that portion of the patch.

When Mark releases Mailman 2.1.10, I'd like to reopen the discussion  
about Mailman 2.2.  I'd like for us to consider moving all new  
development over to that branch, which will allow us to be more  
liberal about accepting new features, within the constraints of  
Mailman 2's architecture of course.

I am planning on releasing an alpha of Mailman 3 by PyCon next month,  
but it will still be lacking a web u/i so I think it still makes sense  
to think about moving almost all current Mailman 2.1 work over to the  
2.2 branch, while still maintaining Mailman 2.1 for security and  
severe performance bugs.

Cheers,
- -Barry

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFHqvtO2YZpQepbvXERAvbpAJ9VbgT8Su7WOmYdlTpf3DEF76iVxgCfdp8o
RQfh9pggeOBAjkCK7CUFtfE=
=rflQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----