[Mailman-Developers] better logging of undiscernable bounces
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Sat Jun 21 07:50:57 CEST 2008
Mark Sapiro writes:
> discernable addresses' message, so the list name isn't really required
> since the list will be identifiable with the first change, and it may
> even seem redundant, but I think it's more consistent to include it on
> all the messages.
Consistency and (some) redundancy is good in logs.
More information about the Mailman-Developers