[Mailman-Developers] before next release: disable backscatterin default installation
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Fri Mar 28 08:14:09 CET 2008
Ian Eiloart writes:
> At a penny per user, I could raise £100. That wouldn't do the job.
No, but if you can find 9 more like you, it would. We heard from one
current Navy personnel, according to Jo Rhett that's a cool $25,000.
Hey, that could probably buy a month of Barry's time ... can you
imagine what we could do with a month of Barry's undivided
attention?<wink> Or how about a month of Mark's time (problem with
Mark is I don't know if his boss is as sympathetic as Barry's boss is
likely to be ...)?
> > I ask, where are these requirements written?
>
> You mean the requirement that the mail system be able to reject email from
> non-members at SMTP time?
I mean the document that says that backscatter is a mortal sin, not
the document that says various people hold the personal opinion that
it would be nice if Mailman would to stop all backscatter.
> If you read the thread carefully, you'll find that my position is that this
> feature is a requirement, but not for 2.1, and maybe not even for 2.2. I
> just want it to happen eventually.
I'm aware of that. Jo Rhett lacks that kind of patience, and more
important, claims to be one of "dozens" similarly impatient
I really think this should happen for 2.2, though, and that 2.2 (or
something) should happen quite soon. I plan to fix up my secondary MX
situation shortly, but not everybody in my situation can do that.
> [This stuff isn't written anywhere more reliable than Wikipedia,
> and that is] why I post to the list.
That's what I was afraid of.
More information about the Mailman-Developers
mailing list