[Mailman-Developers] GNU Mailman roadmap

[Mark Sapiro]

Brian J Mingus wrote:
>
>Perhaps the failure of the mailman dev team to attract community
>participation can be related not to any crazy versioning scheme but rather
>to a failure to engage with the community. I have only recently subscribed
>to this list


You are subscribed to mailman-users, not mailman-developers.


>and I can say that you and every other person that read my
>e-mail saw fit to ignore it.


Not true. There have been extreme moderation delays recently and your
post was only delivered to the mailman-users list on Sunday and it has
not been ignored.

I apologize for the moderation delay. We have added more resources to
the task which we hope will help.


>Your null hypothesis, namely that people who
>send questions and not patches to the list are not worth your time, costs
>you dearly in the long run.


If you read the archives of the mailman-users and mailman-developers
lists, I think you'll find that the above statement is unjustified.

Further, during the moderation delay, I had an irc conversation on
#mailman with someone about the subject of your original mailman-users
post. Was that you? Does that seem like I think your issue is not
worth my time?

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan