[Mailman-Developers] MM3: less generic names for scripts in $PATH?
pabs3 at bonedaddy.net
Mon Jul 11 18:40:43 CEST 2011
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at list.org> wrote:
> `master` and `runner` are a bit more problematic because they are pretty handy
> as separate commands. I don't think they belong under `bin/mailman` and since
> they're of internal use only, I would never expect them to be installed into
> /usr/bin. More likely any vendor package would put them under
> /usr/lib/mailman/bin in an FHS world.
> I'm not sure MM3 can function with `master` and `runner` under
> /usr/lib/mailman/bin but I would accept patches that made that work. (Or at
> least file a bug with a mailman3 tag).
I'll take a look at that this week too since currently they are
installed in $prefix/bin.
More information about the Mailman-Developers