[Mailman-Developers] mailman / archive-ui / licensing questions
Paul Wise
pabs3 at bonedaddy.net
Wed Apr 4 03:32:55 CEST 2012
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I don't think you're going to find the will to make this sort of decision
> right at this instant because what we want the archiver ecosystem to look
> like for mailman3 is somewhat in the air. Do we really want an obviously
> less capable archiver to be the bundled archiver? Do we want to have
> a single blessed archiver (probably in a separate tarball as postorius, the
> admin web ui, is separate) as an eventual goal? Do we want (at least for
> a year or two) to let people go to town with their new ideas for archivers
> and then see if a best-of-breed archiver is raising its head? I don't
> believe any of this is decided inside of our minds yet, so, for now, people
> are defaulting to wait and see.
I think it would be a mistake to bundle any archiver with mailman3.
Listing the available archiver options and their features and
shortcomings would be a better way to go.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
More information about the Mailman-Developers
mailing list