[Mailman-Developers] anti-spam filter

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

Barry Warsaw writes:

 > There are several ways to think about it, but I guess the easiest
 > one is "does this chunk of processing change the message or make a
 > non-destructive moderation decision?"  Or more simply, "is it
 > moderation or modification?"

At least for me, the concept is not a problem.  The issue is (mental)
duck-typing, that's all.

 > Aside: I wanted to find a better name than "handler" for the modification
 > bits, but I failed.  I would have rather done away with the term "handler" in
 > MM3 so suggestions are welcome for the term naming the units that plug into
 > the modification pipeline.

+1