[Mailman-Developers] GSOC Project Discussion
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Sat May 18 04:38:23 CEST 2013
Richard Wackerbarth writes:
> Would it be easier if we just treated owners and moderators as a
> couple of additional mailing lists.
That would require additional, complex attributes that aren't
appropriate for most lists to be given to all lists. They'd have to
have a .virtual_list_for attribute, for example. If non-null, you
can't post to it. (Or can you? Messy.) The owner list would have to
have a .cant_delete_last_subscriber attribute. These lists need to be
suppressed when working with the set of "real" mailing lists. These
lists should be exempted from spam-checking since only Mailman core
ever posts to them. (Or should they? See above.) I think this all
violates duck-typing and gets messier, not easier.
> Thus a moderator would be subscribed to the <XXX(moderators)> list
> and that subscription handled just as any other subscription would
> be handled.
I don't think this will fit users' models of the moderator and owner
roles. Mailing lists have moderators, not an auto-generated
associated mailing list containing only the moderators.
My $0.02.
Steve
More information about the Mailman-Developers
mailing list